DeletedUser4951
Guest
So I have been chatting around lately, and I started getting a few messages from friends on all sides about growing conflict and tension between Molten Scourge, Elysium, and The Victorious Misfits. Despite obviously being on the side of Elysium, I was going to bite my tongue for friendship sake. But due to the fact that apparently some people (TVM) have been putting a lot of words in my mouth in my absence. I feel the need to come out and speak my mind about a lot of things.
1) According to TVM leadership, I practically begged for help vs Southern Alliance and it was a war that they were fighting on our behalf, apparently. While I did game plan for SA, I blatantly said they weren't our top priority past O44. Anyone important knows that. As for me begging, yeah its true I did beg TVM. I begged them to stop attacking because Norbik and Sunmaven just showed me unescorted transport attack after unescorted transport attack. This put a few of SA into the top 12 defenders for no gain. The rest were taken by us prior to Sunmaven's VM. They however did a hell of a job beating her when she was inactive. Also, its nice to see Sunmaven back and still rocking awesome stats. She was a fun defender and I have no doubt that if she wasn't isolated, we would have had more trouble.
2) TVM has a very funny way of viewing things. Apparently Elysium isn't a good alliance anymore because i'm not there and LG is out with a heart condition. This apparently translates to raise issues and threaten their allies over odd issues that are way in the past. Such as MS's NAP with Elysium. According to Paul, "Elysium is a weak alliance who can't conquer their area and needs NAP's now. Such a thing wouldn't have happened under The Smilodon Fatalis" - Paraphrased & taken from shared forum posts and send to me in a PM. Okay Kids, this one if for a cookie. Who was the first to suggest the NAP to Elysium? Also who told Paul that this had happened?
TM accepted these terms back then and now take issue that i'm not there and act like its something totally new to them. Why? Because Elysium won't "honor" the pact and fight MS. God forbid my alliance follow my rules to pacting and NAP's and show a little honor and class towards its allies. Does TM needs its hand held for an alliance that offended it alone? What happened to suddenly being better than Elysium or that Elysium is no longer good? Wouldn't this just be suicide if true? I mean when you look at this seems like total BS. If Elysium is sooo bad now, then you don't bloody need their help and the only reason you would demand is so you could knife them in the back when they are down. Other than that, its probably due to the fact that TVM isn't as good as they are claiming. Up until now the best team they faced is SA, a team they couldn't decisively defeat. In fact, if you look at the last Grepostats conquest page, Grep Reapers had more conquests on SA than TVM. A whooping 2-0 lead to be exact. Yet apparently, Elysium isn't good because it can't finish Illuminati. A rim team that Elysium isn't fully positioned to fight in terms of logistics. Mean while, Elysium just pretty much crushed Romanus this week. A set of players that I can vouch are good.
Another thing I don't get, why is Paul so upset at MS for taking SA? If you could finish off your biggest threat faster and in a respectable manner, then this wouldn't be an issue now would it?
I'm sorry Paul, I like you, but where do you get off telling everyone false stuff about me or making some boogus claims about how you're the best alliance in Gythium now? Because you're gaining more points by having 40+ more players than Elysium? In the past month both Elysium and Molten Scourge have blown TVM out of the water in conquest gains.
Elysium- 222 gains
Molten Scourge- 207 gains
The Victorious Misfits- 182 gains
There is no data to indicate that TVM is better in combat. They just happen to be catching up due to merges. I also don't condone what I have seen out of TVM leadership and them trying to suddenly push their allies around.
Best Wishes,
Daniel
1) According to TVM leadership, I practically begged for help vs Southern Alliance and it was a war that they were fighting on our behalf, apparently. While I did game plan for SA, I blatantly said they weren't our top priority past O44. Anyone important knows that. As for me begging, yeah its true I did beg TVM. I begged them to stop attacking because Norbik and Sunmaven just showed me unescorted transport attack after unescorted transport attack. This put a few of SA into the top 12 defenders for no gain. The rest were taken by us prior to Sunmaven's VM. They however did a hell of a job beating her when she was inactive. Also, its nice to see Sunmaven back and still rocking awesome stats. She was a fun defender and I have no doubt that if she wasn't isolated, we would have had more trouble.
2) TVM has a very funny way of viewing things. Apparently Elysium isn't a good alliance anymore because i'm not there and LG is out with a heart condition. This apparently translates to raise issues and threaten their allies over odd issues that are way in the past. Such as MS's NAP with Elysium. According to Paul, "Elysium is a weak alliance who can't conquer their area and needs NAP's now. Such a thing wouldn't have happened under The Smilodon Fatalis" - Paraphrased & taken from shared forum posts and send to me in a PM. Okay Kids, this one if for a cookie. Who was the first to suggest the NAP to Elysium? Also who told Paul that this had happened?
TM accepted these terms back then and now take issue that i'm not there and act like its something totally new to them. Why? Because Elysium won't "honor" the pact and fight MS. God forbid my alliance follow my rules to pacting and NAP's and show a little honor and class towards its allies. Does TM needs its hand held for an alliance that offended it alone? What happened to suddenly being better than Elysium or that Elysium is no longer good? Wouldn't this just be suicide if true? I mean when you look at this seems like total BS. If Elysium is sooo bad now, then you don't bloody need their help and the only reason you would demand is so you could knife them in the back when they are down. Other than that, its probably due to the fact that TVM isn't as good as they are claiming. Up until now the best team they faced is SA, a team they couldn't decisively defeat. In fact, if you look at the last Grepostats conquest page, Grep Reapers had more conquests on SA than TVM. A whooping 2-0 lead to be exact. Yet apparently, Elysium isn't good because it can't finish Illuminati. A rim team that Elysium isn't fully positioned to fight in terms of logistics. Mean while, Elysium just pretty much crushed Romanus this week. A set of players that I can vouch are good.
Another thing I don't get, why is Paul so upset at MS for taking SA? If you could finish off your biggest threat faster and in a respectable manner, then this wouldn't be an issue now would it?
I'm sorry Paul, I like you, but where do you get off telling everyone false stuff about me or making some boogus claims about how you're the best alliance in Gythium now? Because you're gaining more points by having 40+ more players than Elysium? In the past month both Elysium and Molten Scourge have blown TVM out of the water in conquest gains.
Elysium- 222 gains
Molten Scourge- 207 gains
The Victorious Misfits- 182 gains
There is no data to indicate that TVM is better in combat. They just happen to be catching up due to merges. I also don't condone what I have seen out of TVM leadership and them trying to suddenly push their allies around.
Best Wishes,
Daniel