I love how you talk crap and display it as if it were a given that it is true. Try separating your opinions from the facts.
Of course, you being omniscient, the 4 alliances might as well just not waste our time and go ahead and quit as we "have surely forfeited our success in this world". What a crock. I'd love to go at you one on one without your backup and see who's success get's forfeited.
See, that is an example of talking crap without making it appear I'm stating facts.
Hegemony is nowhere near neutral..I'm surprised as VL's ally you don't know this. They are tied to VL and while they may not attack because they are cowards, they give TONS of defense to support VL so they can focus on offense.
"though drastically one sided" is your opinion. The fact is, the scorecard against us is 3 cities to 1...funny, the battle is 3 alliances to 1. That is a fact. IMO, in a one on one, we'd crush the Bears, do well against VL, and lose to RoS (but not by much).
"despite how horribly unsuccessful it is". We've only ran one op and it was on Mike...and while you guys feel it failed, I learned a lot and became a much better player because of it. That is not a "horribly unsuccesful attack". IMO, you hide behind their skirts. Sooner or later, you'll get hit...then we'll see how much crap you talk. BTW, the attacks you launched at me during a 3 alliance op on me were pathetic...and the 3 of you only took 3 cities...2 before I even knew I was in revolt due to RL stuff. And, RoS wouldn't have gotten those 2 without the excellent play of Tomcat69.
Try becoming a better player before talking smack...I'm 12th on the attack list, you are 17th. Sadly, I have only 29 cities while you have 37. That's THIRTY percent more cities and you are still behind. Maybe you should focus on your game more and talking crap less.