Zemina, great spam wall, filled with lots of useless defensiveness.
A few key points and thats all
1 - Lets define what I mean mean by effective, I'm sure most would agree. This is a WAR game so battle points would be the best indicatior of effectiveness. If we were playing sims by all means you have outbuilt us, there has been no denying the building points you have. But for every point we have, we kill more. You even showed us that stat yourself. So how is it your twice as effective as us on the player level again? We're looking for stats here, showing that your points are more effective in combat than ours. If you can show that, sure I'll admit your better.. not until then, your just buying your success and we all know it.
2 - You admitted to having a NAP/PACT with the top 4 alliances.. now we're fighting the top 2 plus others. You say we're fighting 11,12,whatever? Well yes we're fighting everybody (well most everybody) glad you picked up on that. Your alliance, 15 mil. Our alliance, 5 mil. So you've got 10 mil on us. Our secondary enemies nearly add up to the same size as us, and not a single one do we have a 10 mil advantage on. You can't even begin to try and say you have anywhere near as hard as a battle as we're fighting and enjoying, so may want to try and use another angle as this one will fail every time.
3 - About your city, sure - effort is great but city ownership and teammates that can time is better. However, I'll drop this one as you gave respect for the takeover. I will not reply to a nice complement by being mean, at least not now. Thanks for the respect, I'll pass that on to Ron... always fun to have some positives in the propoganda we spew out here
4 - As far as trading EN usernames, do your homework and find them out yourself. We already know who you are and where your from. Now you go out and do your homework like my original post requested if you want the same info from us. If not, thats fine too it really doesn't matter, right? This is the only world that matters now. I was just trying to give you something to look into that would have interesting results should you try and succeed. May make it sweater for some of you, maybe not.
5 - As far as who will win, thats a good question. It could be TA, it could be some random alliance that doesn't even exist currently, or any other number of the Top 10 that work diplomacy to their advantage. Because, after all, winning grepolis after we moved into the 2.0 version became who can sim the best, not fight the best. The title "winner" really is up for grabs. We're just going for "most effective", "most annoying", or "one hell of a fight". Winner would be ok also, but not our primary concern as we want to fight.. and thats what we're doing and will keep doing until we kill you or you kill us. And if we kill you, Flippy over there can be next.. I actually hear he has some skills in leadership and combat, but have yet to directly interact with him at all except for this random side comment.
As far as your most recent post, I think you need to stop trying to win with math lol its not working.
I'm not even the highest ABP in my alliance and lets compare our "ABP per city"
Your cities: 50. ABP: 134245. Per city: 2864.9
My Cities: 21. ABP: 88929. Per City: 4234.7
So did you just admit that I'm better than you (and more HG players are higher than this) because:
"But what this all means is I am a more effective player statistically and strategically than anyone that does not surpass me in ABP per city gained"
I mean damn what side are you arguing for?
OH and finally, flippy I can promise you noxnox is not using an IP tracker. Get your facts right.